Workshop/Anarchism and American Traditions
|This page contains raw, unedited text or incomplete listings.|
|The Libertarian Labyrinth is going through a series of upgrades and changes.|
|Until then, please pardon our dust.|
AMERICAN traditions, begotten of religious re- bellion, small self-sustaining communities, isolated conditions, and hard pioneer life, grew during the colonization period of one hundred and seventy years from the settling of Jamestown to the outburst of the Revolution. This was in fact the great constitution- making epoch, the period of charters guaranteeing more or less of liberty, the general tendency of which is well described by Wm. Penn in speaking of the charter for Pennsylvania : "I want to put it out of my power, or that of my successors, to do mischief."
The revolution is the sudden and unified consciousness of these traditions, their loud assertion, the blow dealt by their indomitable will against the counter force of ty- ranny, which has never entirely recovered from the blow, but which from then till now has gone on remolding and regrappling the instruments of governmental power, that the Revolution sought to shape and hold as defenses of liberty.
To the average American of to-day, the Revolution means the series of battles fought by the patriot army with the armies of England. The millions of school children who attend our public schools are taught to draw maps of the siege of Boston and the siege of York-
ANARCHISM AND AMERICAN TRADITIONS 119
town, to know the general plan of the several campaigns, to quote the number of prisoners of war surrendered with Burgoyne; they are required to remember the date when Washington crossed the Delaware on the ice; they are told to "Remember Paoli," to repeat "Molly Stark's a widow," to call General Wayne "Mad Anthony Wayne," and to execrate Benedict Arnold; they know that the Declaration of Independence was signed on the Fourth of July, 1776, and the Treaty of Paris in 1783 ; and then they think they have learned the Revolution blessed be George Washington! They have no idea why it should have been called a "revolution" instead of the "English war," or any similar title : it's the name of it, that's all. And name- worship, both in child and man, has acquired such mastery of them, that the name "American Revo- lution" is held sacred, though it means to them nothing more than successful force, while the name "Revolution" applied to a further possibility, is a spectre detested and abhorred. In neither case have they any idea of the con- tent of the word, save that of armed force. That has al- ready happened, and long happened, which Jefferson foresaw when he wrote :
"The spirit of the times may alter, will alter. Our rulers will become corrupt, our people careless. A single zealot may become persecutor, and better men be his vic- tims. It can never be too often repeated that the time for fixing every essential right, on a legal basis, is while our rulers are honest, ourselves united. From the conclu- sion of this war we shall be going down hill. It will not then be necessary to resort every moment to the people for support. They will be forgotten, therefore, and their rights disregarded. They will forget themselves in the sole faculty of making money, and will never think of uniting to effect a due respect for their rights. The shackles, therefore, which shall not be knocked off at the
1 20 VOLTAIRINE DE CLEYRE
conclusion of this war, will be heavier and heavier, till our rights shall revive or expire in a convulsion."
To the men of that time, who voiced the spirit of that time, the battles that they fought were the least of the Revolution; they were the incidents of the hour, the things they met and faced as part of the game they were playing; but the stake they had in view, before, during, and after the war, the real Revolution, was a change in political institutions which should make of government not a thing apart, a superior power to stand over the people with a whip, but a serviceable agent, responsible, economical, and trustworthy (but never so much trusted as not to be continually watched), for the transaction of such business as was the common concern, and to set the limits of the common concern at the line where one man's liberty would encroach upon another's.
They thus took their starting point for deriving a min- imum of government upon the same sociological ground that the modern Anarchist derives the no-government theory; viz., that equal liberty is the political ideal. The difference lies in the belief, on the one hand, that the clos- est approximation to equal liberty might be best secured by the rule of the majority in those matters involving united action of any kind (which rule of the majority they thought it possible to secure by a few simple ar- rangements for election), and, on the other hand, the belief that majority rule is both impossible and undesir- able ; that any government, no matter what its forms, will be manipulated by a very small minority, as the develop- ment of the State and United States governments has strikingly proved; that candidates will loudly profess allegiance to platforms before elections, which as officials in power they will openly disregard, to do as they please ; and that even if the majority will could be imposed, it would also be subversive of equal liberty, which may be
ANARCHISM AND AMERICAN TRADITIONS 121
best secured by leaving to the voluntary association of those interested in the management of matters of common concern, without coercion of the uninter&sted or the opposed.
Among the fundamental likenesses between the Revolu- tionary Republicans and the Anarchists is the recognition that the little must precede the great ; that the local must be the basis of the general ; that there can be a free fed- eration only when there are free communities to federate ; that the spirit of the latter is carried into the councils of the former, and a local tyranny may thus become an in- strument for general enslavement. Convinced of the su- preme importance of ridding the municipalities of the institutions of tyranny, the most strenuous advocates of independence, instead of spending their efforts mainly in the general Congress, devoted themselves to their home localities, endeavoring to work out of the minds of their neighbors and fellow-colonists the institutions of entailed property, of a State-Church, of a class-divided people, even the institution of African slavery itself. Though largely unsuccessful, it is to the measure of success they did achieve that we are indebted for such liberties as we do retain, and not to the general government. They tried to inculcate local initiative and independent action. The author of the Declaration of Independence, who in the fall of '76 declined a re-election to Congress in order to return to Virginia and do his work in his own local as- sembly, in arranging there for public education which he justly considered a matter of "common concern," said his advocacy of public schools was not with any "view to take its ordinary branches out of the hands of private enterprise, which manages so much better the concerns to which it is equal"; and in endeavoring to make clear the restrictions of the Constitution upon the functions of the general government, he likewise said : "Let the gen-
122 VOLTAIRINE DE CLEYRE
government be reduced to foreign concerns only, anH let our affairs be disentangled from those of all other nations, except as to commerce, which the merchants will manage the better the more they are left free to man- age for themselves, and the general government may be reduced to a very simple organization, and a very inex- pensive one ; a few plain duties to be performed by a few servants." This then was the American tradition, that private enterprise manages better all that to which it is equal. Anarchism declares that private enterprise, whether individual or co-operative, is equal to all the undertakings of society. And it quotes the particular two instances, Education and Commerce, which the governments of the States and of the United States have undertaken to man- age and regulate, as the very two which in operation have done more to destroy American freedom and equality, to warp and distort American tradition, to make of govern" ment a mighty engine of tyranny, than any other cause, save the unforeseen developments of Manufacture.
It was the intention of the Revolutionists to establish a system of common education, which should make the teaching of history one of its principal branches ; not with the intent of burdening the memories of our youth with the dates of battles or the speeches of generals, nor to make of the Boston Tea Party Indians the <one sacrosanct mob in all history, to be revered but never on any account to be imitated, but with the intent that every American should know to what conditions the masses of people had been brought by the operation of certain institutions, by what means they had wrung out their liberties, and how those liberties had again and again been filched from them by the use of governmental force, fraud, and privi- lege. Not to breed security, laudation, complacent indo- lence, passive acquiescence in the acts of a government protected by the label "home-made," but to beget a wake-
ANARCHISM AND AMERICAN TRADITIONS 123
ful jealousy, a never-ending watchfulness of rulers, a de- termination to squelch every attempt of those entrusted with power to encroach upon the sphere of individual ac- tion this was the prime motive of the revolutionists in endeavoring to provide for common education.
"Confidence," said the revolutionists who adopted the Kentucky Resolutions, "is everywhere the parent of despotism; free government is founded in jealousy, not in confidence; it is jealousy, not confidence, which pre- scribes limited constitutions to bind down those whom we are obliged to trust with power; our Constitution has accordingly fixed the limits to which, and no further, our confidence may go. * * * In questions of power, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution."
These resolutions were especially applied to the passage of the Alien laws by the monarchist party during John Adams' administration, and were an indignant call from the State of Kentucky to repudiate the right of the gen- eral government to assume undelegated powers, for, said they, to accept these laws would be "to be bound by laws made, not with our consent, but by others against our consent that is, to surrender the form of government we have chosen, and to live under one deriving its powers from its own will, and not from our authority." Reso- lutions identical in spirit were also passed by Virginia, the following month; in those days the States still con- sidered themselves supreme, the general government sub- ordinate.
To inculcate this proud spirit of the supremacy of the people over their governors was to be the purpose of pub- lic education ! Pick up to-day any common school history, and see how much of this spirit you will find therein. On the contrary, from cover to cover you will find nothing but the cheapest sort of patriotism, the inculcation of the
124 VQLTAIRINE DE CLEYRE
most unquestioning acquiescence in the deeds of govern- ment, a lullaby of rest, security, confidence, the doctrine that the Law can do no wrong, a Te Deum in praise of the continuous encroachments of the powers of the gen- eral government upon the reserved rights of the States, shameless falsification of all acts of rebellion, to put the government in the right and the rebels in the wrong, py- rotechnic glorifications of union, power, and force, and a complete ignoring of the essential liberties to maintain which was the purpose of the revolutionists. The anti- Anarchist law of post-McKinley passage, a much worse law than the Alien and Sedition acts which roused the wrath of Kentucky and Virginia to the point of threat- ened rebellion, is exalted as a wise provision of our All- Seeing Father in Washington.
Such is the spirit of government-provided schools. Ask any child what he knows about Shays's re- bellion, and he will answer, "Oh, some of the farmers couldn't pay their taxes, and Shays led a rebellion against the court-house at Worcester, so they could burn up the deeds ; and when Washington heard of it he sent over an army quick and taught 'em a good lesson" "And what was the result of it?" "The result? Why why the result was Oh yes, I remember the result was they saw the need of a strong federal government to collect the taxes and pay the debts." Ask if he knows what was said on the other side of the story, ask if he knows that the men who had given their goods and their health and their strength for the freeing of the country now found themselves cast into prison for debt, sick, disabled, and poor, facing a new tyranny for the old ; that their demand was that the land should become the free communal pos- session of those who wished to work it, not subject to tribute, and the child will answer "No." Ask him if he
ANARCHISM AND AMERICAN TRADITIONS 125
ever read Jefferson's letter to Madison about it, in whicH he says:
"Societies exist under three forms, sufficiently dis- tinguishable. I. Without government, as among our In- dians. 2. Under government wherein the will of every one has a just influence; as is the case in England in a slight degree, and in our States in a great one. 3. Under government of force, as is the case in all other mon- archies, and in most of the other republics. To have an idea of the curse of existence in these last, they must be seen. It is a government of wolv^ c ~*wer sheep. It is a problem not clear in my mind thf^" 116 ^ ^rst condition is not the best. But I believe it to b^ e . r U}sistent with any great degree of population. The second state has a great deal of good in it. ... It has its evils, too, the principal of which is the turbulence to which it is sub- ject. . . . But even this evil is productive of good. It prevents the degeneracy of government, and nourishes a general attention to public affairs. I hold that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing."
Or to another correspondent: "God forbid that we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion ! . . . What country can preserve its liberties if its rul- ers are not warned from time to time that the people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take up arms. . . . The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure." Ask any school child if he was ever taught that the author of the Declaration of Inde- pendence, one of the great founders of the common school, said these things, and he will look at you with open mouth and unbelieving eyes. Ask him if he ever heard that the man who sounded the bugle note in the darkest hour of the Crisis, who roused the courage of the soldiers when Washington saw only mutiny and despair
126 VOLTAIRINE DE CLEYRE
ahead, ask him if he knows that this man also wrote, "Government at best is a necessary evil, at worst an intolerable one," and if he is a little better informed than the average he will answer, "Oh well, he was an infidel !" Catechize him about the merits of the Constitution which he has learned to repeat like a poll-parrot, and you will find his chief conception is not of the powers withheld from Congress, but of the powers granted.
Such are the fruits of government schools. We, the Anarchists, point to them and say: If the believers in liberty wish th^ p^s-c^iples of liberty taught, let them never intrust tKlien auction to any government ; for the nature of governV.Y a, is to become a thing apart, an in- stitution existing for its own sake, preying upon the people, and teaching whatever will tend to keep it secure in its seat. As the fathers said of the governments of Europe, so say we of this government also after a cen- tury and a quarter of independence: "The blood of the people has become its inheritance, and those who fatten on it will not relinquish it easily."
Public education, having to do with the intellect and spirit of a people, is probably the most subtle and far- reaching engine for molding the course of a nation; but commerce, dealing as it does with material things and producing immediate effects, was the force that bore down soonest upon the paper barriers of constitutional restriction, and shaped the government to its requirements. Here, indeed, we arrive at the point where we, looking over the hundred and twenty-five years of independence, can see that the simple government conceived by the revo- lutionary republicans was a foredoomed failure. It was so because of (i) the essence of government itself; (2) the essence of human nature; (3) the essence of Com- merce and Manufacture.
Of the essence of government, I have already said, it is
ANARCHISM AND AMERICAN TRADITIONS 127
a thing apart, developing its own interests at the expense of what opposes it ; all attempts to make it anything else fail. In this Anarchists agree with the traditional enemies of the Revolution, the monarchists, federalists, strong government believers, the Roosevelts of to-day, the Jays, Marshalls, and Hamiltons of then, that Hamilton, who, as Secretary of the Treasury, devised a financial system of which we are the unlucky heritors, and whose objects were twofold: To puzzle the people and make public finance obscure to those that paid for it; to serve as a machine for corrupting the legislatures ; "for he avowed the opinion that man could be governed by two motives only, force or interest;" force being then out of the ques- tion, he laid hold of interest, the greed of the legislators, to set going an association of persons having an entirely separate welfare from the welfare of their electors, bound together by mutual corruption and mutual desire for plunder. The Anarchist agrees that Hamilton was logical, and understood the core of government; the difference is, that while strong governmentalists believe this is necessary and desirable, we choose the opposite conclusion, NO GOVERNMENT WHATEVER.
As to the essence of human nature, what our national experience has made plain is this, that to remain in a con- tinually exalted moral condition is not human nature. That has happened which was prophesied : we have gone down hill from the Revolution until now; we are ab- sorbed in "mere money-getting." The desire for mate- rial ease long ago vanquished the spirit of '76. What was that spirit? The spirit that animated the people of Virginia, of the Carolinas, of Massachusetts, of New York, when they refused to import goods from Eng- land; when they preferred (and stood by it) to wear coarse homespun cloth, to drink the brew of their own growths, to fit their appetites to the home supply, rather
128 VOLTAIRINE DE CLEYRE
than submit to the taxation of the imperial ministry. Even within the lifetime of the revolutionists the spirit decayed, The love of material ease has been, in the mass of men and permanently speaking, always greater than the love of liberty. Nine hundred and ninety-nine women out of a thousand are more interested in the cut of a dress than in the independence of their sex; nine hundred and nine-nine men out of a thousand are more interested in drinking a glass of beer than in questioning the tax that is laid on it; how many children are not willing to trade the liberty to play for the promise of a new cap or a new dress? This it is which begets the complicated mechanism of society; this it is which, by multiplying the concerns of government, multiplies the strength of government and the corresponding weakness of the people; this it is which begets indifference to public concern, thus making the corruption of government easy.
As to the essence of Commerce and Manufacture, it is this: to establish bonds between every corner of the earth's surface and every other corner, to multiply the needs of mankind, and the desire for material possession and enjoyment.
The American tradition was the isolation of the States as far as possible. Said they : We have won our liberties by hard sacrifice and struggle unto death. We wish now to be let alone and to let others alone, that our prin- ciples may have time for trial ; that we may become ac- customed to the exercise of our rights; that we may be kept free from the contaminating influence of European gauds, pagents, distinctions. So richly did they esteem the absence of these that they could in all fervor write : "We shall see multiplied instances of Europeans coming to America, but no man living will ever see an instance of an American removing to settle in Europe, and con- tinuing there." Alas ! In less than a hundred years the
ANARCHISM AND AMERICAN TRADITIONS 129
highest aim of a "Daughter of the Revolution" was, and is, to buy a castle, a title, and a rotten lord, with the money wrung from American servitude! And the com- mencial interests of America are seeking a world-empire !
In the earlier days of the revolt and subsequent inde- pendence, it appeared that the "manifest destiny" of America was to be an agricultural people, exchanging food stuffs and raw materials for manufactured articles. And in those days it was written : "We shall by virtuous as long as agriculture is our principal object, which will be the case as long as there remain vacant lands in any part of America. When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe, we shall become corrupt as in Europe, and go to eating one another as they do there." Which we are doing, because of the inevitable develop- ment of Commerce and Manufacture, and the con- comitant development of strong government. And the parallel prophecy is likewise fulfilled : "If ever this vast country is brought under a single government, it will be one of the most extensive corruption, indifferent and incapable of a wholesome care over so wide a spread of surface." There is not upon the face of the earth to-day a government so utterly and shamelessly corrupt as that of the United States of America. There are others more cruel, more tyrannical, more devastating; there is none so utterly venal.
And yet even in the very days of the prophets, even with their own consent, the first concession to this later tyranny was made. It was made when the Constitution was made ; and the Constitution was made chiefly because of the demands of Commerce. Thus it was at the outset a merchant's machine, which the other interests of the country, the land and labor interests, even then foreboded would destroy their liberties. In vain their jealousy of its central power made them enact the first twelve amend-
I3O yOLTAIRINE DE CLEYRE
ments. In vain they endeavored to set bounds over which the federal power dare not trench. In vain they enacted into general law the freedom of speech, of the press, of assemblage and petition. All of these things we see ridden rough-shod upon every day, and have so seen with more or less intermission since the beginning of the nineteenth century. At this day, every police lieutenant considers himself, and rightly so, as more powerful than the General Law of the Union; and that one who told Robert Hunter that he held in his fist something stronger than the Constitution, was perfectly correct. The right of assemblage is an American tradition which has gone out of fashion; the police club is now the mode. And it is so in virtue of the people's indifference to liberty, and the steady progress of constitutional interpretation towards the substance of imperial government.
It is an American tradition that a standing army is a standing menace to liberty; in Jefferson's presidency the army was reduced to 3,000 men. It is American tradition that we keep out of the affairs of other nations. It is American practice that we meddle with the affairs of everybody else from the West to the East Indies, from Russia to Japan; and to do it we have a standing army of 83,251 men.
It is American tradition that the financial affairs of a nation should be transacted on the same principles of simple honesty that an individual conducts his oWn busi- ness ; viz., that debt is a bad thing, and a man's first sur- plus earnings should be applied to his debts ; that offices and office-holders should be few. It is American prac- tice that the general government should always have mil- lions of debt, even if a panic or a war has to be forced to prevent its being paid off ; and as to the application of its income, office-holders come first. And within the last administration it is reported that 99,000 offices have been
ANARCHISM AND AMERICAN TRADITIONS 131
created at an annual expense of $63,000,000. Shades of Jefferson! "How are vacancies to be obtained? Those by deaths are few; by resignation none." Roosevelt cuts the knot by making 99,000 new ones ! And few will die, and none resign. They will beget sons and daughters, and Taf t will have to create 99,000 more ! Verily, a sim- ple and a serviceable thing is our general government.
It is American tradition that the Judiciary shall act as a check upon the impetuosity of Legislatures, should these attempt to pass the bounds of constitutional limita- tion. It is American practice that the Judiciary justifies every law which trenches on the liberties of the people and nullifies every act of the Legislature by which the people seek to regain some measure of their freedom. Again, in the words of Jefferson : "The Constitution is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the Judiciary, which they may twist and shape in any form they please." Truly, if the men who fought the good fight for the triumph of simple, honest, free life in that day, were now to look upon the scene of their labors, they would cry out together with him who said: "I regret that I am now to die in the belief that the useless sacrifice of themselves by the generation of '76 to acquire self-government and happiness to their country, is to be thrown away by the unwise and unworthy passions of their sons, and that my only consolation is to be that I shall not live to see it."
And now, what has Anarchism to say to all this, this bankruptcy of republicanism, this modern empire that has grown up on the ruins of our early freedom? We say this, that the sin our fathers sinned was that they did not trust liberty wholly. They thought it possible to com- promise between liberty and government, believing the latter to be "a necessary evil", and the moment the com- promise was made, the whole misbegotten monster of our
1 32 VOLTAIRINE DE CLEYRE
present tyranny began to grow. Instruments which are set up to safeguard rights become the very whip with which the free are struck.
Anarchism says, Make no laws whatever concerning speech, and speech will be free; so soon as you make a declaration on paper that speech shall be free, you will have a hundred lawyers proving that "freedom does not mean abuse, nor liberty license" ; and they will define and define freedom out of existence. Let the guarantee of free speech be in every man's determination to use it, and we shall have no need of paper declarations. On the other hand, so long as the people do not care to exercise their freedom, those who wish to tyrannize will do so; for tyrants are active and ardent, and will devote themselves in the name of any number of gods, religious and other- wise, to put shackles upon sleeping men.
The problem then becomes, Is it possible to stir men from their indifference? We have said that the spirit of liberty was nurtured by colonial life ; that the elements of colonial life were the desire for sectarian independence, and the jealous watchfulness incident thereto; the isola- tion of pioneer communities which threw each individual strongly on his own resources, and thus developed all- around men, yet at the same time made very strong such social bonds as did exist; and, lastly, the comparative simplicity of small communities.
All this has mostly disappeared. As to sectarianism, it is only by dint of an occasional idiotic persecution that a sect becomes interesting; in the absence of this, out- landish sects play the fool's role, are anything but heroic, and have little to do with either the name or the sub- stance of liberty. The old colonial religious parties have gradually become the "pillars of society," their animosities
have di$<3 put, their offensive peculiarities fcavs
ANARCHISM AND AMERICAN TRADITIONS 133
effaced, they are as like one another as beans in a pod, they build churches and sleep in them.
As to our communities, they are hopelessly and help- lessly interdependent, as we ourselves are, save that con- tinuously diminishing proportion engaged in all around farming; and even these are slaves to mortgages. For our cities, probably there is not one that is provisioned to last a week, and certainly there is none which would not be bankrupt with despair at the proposition that it produce its own food. In response to this condition and its correlative political tyranny, Anarchism affirms the economy of self-sustenance, the disintegration of the great communities, the use of the earth.
I am not ready to say that I see clesrly that this will take place; but I see clearly that this must take place if ever again men are to be free. I am so well satisfied that the mass of mankind prefer material possessions to lib- erty, that I have no hope that they will ever, by means of intellectual or moral stirrings merely, throw off the yoke of oppression fastened on them by the present economic system, to institute free societies. My only hope is in the blind development of the economic system and political oppression itself. The great characteristic looming factor in this gigantic power is Manufacture. The tendency of each nation is to become more and more a manufacturing one, an exporter of fabrics, not an importer. If this ten- dency follows its own logic, is must eventually circle round to each community producing for itself. What then will become of the surplus product when the manu- facturer shall have no foreign market? Why, then man- kind must face the dilemma of sitting down and dying in the midst of it, or confiscating the goods.
Indeed, we are partially facing this problem even now ; and so far we are sitting down and dying. I opine, how- ever, that men will not do it forever : and when once by
I J4 VOLTAIRINE DE CLEYRE
an act of general expropriation they have overcome the reverence and fear of property, and their awe of govern- ment, they may waken to the consciousness that things are to be used, and therefore men are greater than things. This may rouse the spirit of liberty.
If, on the other hand, the tendency of invention to sim- plify, enabling the advantages of machinery to be com- bined with smaller aggregations of workers, shall also follow its own logic, the great manufacturing plants will break up, population will go after the fragments, and there will be seen not indeed the hard, self-sustaining, isolated pioneer communities of early America, but thou- sands of small communities stretching along the lines of transportation, each producing very largely for its own needs, able to rely upon itself, and therefore able to be independent. For the same rule holds good for societies as for individuals, those may be free who are able to make their own living.
In regard to the breaking up of that vilest creation of tyranny, the standing army and navy, it is clear that so long as men desire to fight, they will have armed force in one form or another. Our fathers thought they had guarded against a standing army by providing for the voluntary militia. In our day we have lived to see this militia declared part of the regular military force of the United States, and subject to the same demands as the regulars. Within another generation we shall probably see its members in the regular pay of the general govern- ment. Since any embodiment of the fighting spirit, any military organization, inevitably follows the same line of centralization, the logic of Anarchism is that the least objectionable form of armed force is that which springs up voluntarily, like the minute-men of Massachusetts, and disbands as soon as the occasion which called it into existence is past: that the really desirable thing is that
ANARCHISM AND AMERICAN TRADITIONS. 135
all men not Americans only should be at peace; and that to reach this, all peaceful persons should withdraw their support from the army, and require that all who make war shall do so at their own cost and risk; that neither pay nor pensions are to be provided for those who choose to make man-killing a trade.
As to the American tradition of non-meddling, Anarch- ism asks that it be carried down to the individual him- self. It demands no jealous barrier of isolation ; it knows that such isolation is undesirable and impossible; but it teaches that by all men's strictly minding their own busi- ness, a fluid society, freely adapting itself to mutual needs, wherein all the world shall belong to all men, as much as each has need or desire, will result.
And when Modern Revolution has thus been carried to the heart of the whole world if it ever shall be, as I hope it will, then may we hope to see a resurrection of that proud spirit of our fathers which put the simple dignity of Man above the gauds of wealth and class, and held that to be an American was greater than to be a king.
In that day there shall be neither kings nor Americans, only Men ; over the whole earth, MEN.